Smarter Than Thou!

THE IMMIGRANT ELEPHANT (IN THE ROOM)

THE IMMIGRANT ELEPHANT (IN THE ROOM)

I like conspiracy theories. I do not think that I do any more than most people. They are attractive. Their primary characteristic is that they fill in gaps in otherwise incomplete explanations and analysis (which is a great title for a publication). Even when they are rather “extreme” they still attract… at least they attract me. I offer one, mostly for fun, even if it lacks perfect credibility.  

I once watched a film about wild elephants. This is not quite true, as I shall explain. The movie took place in one of those Asian nations where elephants are still used as “machines.” That is they carry heavy loads, etc. The workers go out in the woods and find a wild female elephant. In this case she was a mother with a nearly fully grown calf. They trap and confine the mother and chase off the child. Then they begin a process of training, so that the mother will become a useful resource. I should add that it appeared that the new owners treated the new “employee” well.

Why was the calf not kept? A related question is: why not raise an elephants from birth? Younger elephants probably are more readily trained. The answer is simple. Until capture the mother lives in the jungle and feeds herself and the calf, costing the owners precisely nothing. An already “raised” elephant is thus a more profitable asset. One that needed years of feeding and care, before becoming a worker, is not so profitable. The process of delayed taming makes sense.

The reality of illegal immigration involves mostly young adults. It is not always so easy for younger children to cross the border. What the USA wants, legally or illegally, are young adults, who are healthy workers. Especially desired are those who have some training in basic skills, and are family men who send money home. In other words, these people have already been raised, at the expense of their families back in Mexico. When they get here they are like that mother elephant.   Lots of the expenses have already been paid for. The resulting profits have been increased. This may be why nothing really will get done to solve the “immigration problem.”

I think that the establishment may have seen the same movie that I did.  

BLACK SUPREMACY?

    THOSE who support the president often face the charge of advocating “white supremacy.” This is the position that White people are, automatically, better than minorities. And this term means that nature and culture favor all White people. The alleged evidence is that White people, in general, have better jobs, more wealth, higher status, and have overall better lives. This, allegedly, is the result of White privilege, as opposed to superior values and/or a defective Black subculture.

    Regardless of what the professional race merchants say, or believe, the opposite is actually the case. I offer proof by illustration of an important governmental function. For the ordinary citizen the most import activity in which he may participate is jury duty. Justly depriving a person of his freedom, property, basic rights---even his life---are significant actions. So is freeing the wrongly accused. Either verdict requires the best citizens doing their best. The jurors should be, as much as possible, persons of perception, impartiality and prudent, sober judgment.

    Numerous court decisions, based usually upon successful appeals to high courts, have decided that race is, and should be, a major factor in determining the composition of juries. The rulings are quite candid. Too many White people on a jury will automatically prevent a fair trial from taking place. The only remedy is to replace the White guys with Blacks. This, according to the official opinions of learned judges, of necessity, improves the jury. In other words, the inferior and defective (i.e. White jurors) are to be replaced by the inherently superior (Black jurors). A mixed jury is in se superior to an all White one. Whites, apparently because of their DNA are, when they compose the entire jury, incapable of being fair.

    The ONLY is that the government acknowledges Blacks as fairer, more perceptive and more honest than flesh colored citizens. In other words, Black supremacy is part of the law of the land.  Why is it that no one else has noticed?